Follow us on Twitter Follow Us on Facebook

  DRC Home | Applicants Guide (PDF) | Submittals Checklist (PDF) |Application Form (PDF) | Agendas

Northeast Design Review Case Report

ST. MARTIN DE PORRES HIGH SCHOOL

Back Return to Case List | Start Over | Print Report (PDF format)

Project Information

Northeast Case #  NE 2014-017

Address: 6202 St. Clair
Company: Studio Techne
Architect: Studio Techne
Description:

Seeking conceptual approval of the proposed building and site design.
Notes:  

Committee Actions/Submissions

Date: May 5, 2014
Committee: Staff
Action Type: Initial Plan Submission
Conditions/Notes:  
 
Date: May 13, 2014
Committee: Local Design Review Committee
Action Type: Approved
Conditions:  

Committee Concerns

· Why two types of glass? Liked the play of the two finishes and to have something more solar reflective.

· Some amount of spandrel being used so people can see the exposed steel and construction.

· The Norwood Ave elevation is more successful than the St. Clair elevation? Due to the punch outs on the St. Clair face.

· Which power company are you working with? What types of lighting are you actually allowed to do? CPP is purchasing the light, but St. Martin is using them and lowering the street light at that intersection to make it a more pedestrian scale.

· Is the city going to put in permeable pavement for the bioswales?

· Take a look at the entrances on St. Clair because they look like windows and not doors?

· Look at the relationship to other buildings in the area?

· The first floor windows can be improved upon because they windows look squat and are underplayed.

· Can we see what the building will look like at night?

Members Present

Benny Chew = 1st

R. Scott Nieswander = 2nd

Elmer Turner (CH)

Olga Andreyvska

Peggy Brown

Motion to approve the conceptual approval of the new addition with the condition of studying the windows on the first floor and looking at the junction of the coppertop building and the St. Clair facade. Unanimously approved.

Remarks from CM Johnson; and CRS were in attendance for this case.
Date: December 9, 2014
Committee: Staff
Action Type: Initial Plan Submission
Conditions/Notes:  
 
Date: December 16, 2014
Committee: Local Design Review Committee
Action Type: Approved
Conditions:  

Voting Members Present

  • K. Vislosky
  • S. Nieswander
  • O. Andreyivska
  • N. Reich
  • E. Turner
  • C. Poh
  • P. Brown

Committee Concerns

  • Why the decision to alternate trees in the landscaping?
  • Is the intent to canopy the courtyard with trees/leafy material?
  • Where are the mechanical systems for the building?
  • Where is the parking lot?

Motion to approve the final development plans as is.
Date: November 10, 2015
Committee: Staff
Action Type: Resubmittal
Conditions/Notes:  
 
Date: November 17, 2015
Committee: Local Design Review Committee
Action Type: Approved
Conditions:  

Voting Members Present

  • A. Luckasy
  • N. Reich
  • E. Turner
  • C. Poh (2nd)
  • P. Brown (1st)

 

Marc Ciccarelli presented the new phasing.  At this point they can only afford to construct the Norwood leg of the school building.

 

James Amendola representing SCSDC corp.  SCSDC is in support of the project and the new phasing.

 

Committee Comments

  • What is the treatment of the exposed wall?
  • How soon do you anticipate moving into the Norwood space?

 

Motion to approve new phasing plan as is. 

Home | CPC Agendas | Design Review | GIS Map | Landmarks Commission | Board of Zoning Appeals | Contact Us

• CLEVELAND CITY PLANNING COMMISSION •