Follow us on Twitter Follow Us on Facebook

  DRC Home | Applicants Guide (PDF) | Submittals Checklist (PDF) |Application Form (PDF) | Agendas

Euclid Corridor Design Review Case Report

CLEVELAND CLINIC - CLEVELAND INNOVATION DISTRICT (CID)

Back Return to Case List | Start Over | Print Report (PDF format)

Project Information

Euclid Corridor Case #  EC 2023-005

Address: northwest & northeast corners of E 100th Street & Cedar
Company: Moody Nolan
Architect: HOK (w/Moody Nolan as local rep) & Gilbane Building Co.
Description:
Notes:  

Committee Actions/Submissions

Date: February 9, 2023
Committee: Staff
Action Type: Initial Plan Submission
Conditions/Notes:  
 
Date: February 16, 2023
Committee: Local Design Review Committee
Action Type: Schematic Approval W/Conditions
Conditions:  

1) Facade and Massing needs further study:

    a) Can penthouse be stepped back to create more articulation?  Consider changes in plane to avoid a heavy / rigid / strict feeling. Building design references water and some changes can better illustrate that.

    b) CBA building at corner could be reflected as active instead of mechanical. Is there an opportunity for some active programming at this location?

2) Landscape - plaza does not reflect actual placemaking and feels like a space of transition.  Consider an opportunity to include an interpretive feature to describe what's going on inside. Benches are decorative and it doesn't feel like a true public space.

 

 
Date: February 17, 2023
Committee: City Planning Commission
Action Type: Schematic Design Approval
Conditions:  

with Conditions: Incorporate the DRAC's comments; reminding applicant to be more intentional in reaching out to the surrounding community; urging applicant to create outdoor sapces that are engaging for folks who work there, travel through the campus,

Date: May 25, 2023
Committee: Staff
Action Type: Revised Plan Submission
Conditions/Notes:  
 
Date: June 1, 2023
Committee: Local Design Review Committee
Action Type: Approved with Conditions
Conditions:  

1) Upper two mechanical screening solutions are further studied to help alleviate massing of the two mechanical levels.

Motion; Augoustidis, Second; Brown

Voting members: Rothenberg, Augoustidis, Brown, Holland, Madison, Pace, Solon, Strean, Trotta, Calhoun

Non-voting members; Scott, Provolt, Tzeng

 
Date: June 2, 2023
Committee: City Planning Commission
Action Type: Approved with Conditions
Conditions:  

Incorporate the DRAC's comments; amenities plan should be reviewed by staff for approval.