Euclid Corridor Design Review Case Report
CLEVELAND CLINIC - CLEVELAND INNOVATION DISTRICT (CID)
Return to Case List | Start Over | Print Report (PDF format)
Project Information
Euclid Corridor Case # EC 2023-005
Address: | northwest & northeast corners of E 100th Street & Cedar |
Company: | Moody Nolan |
Architect: | HOK (w/Moody Nolan as local rep) & Gilbane Building Co. |
Description: | |
Notes: | |
Committee Actions/Submissions
Date: | February 9, 2023 |
Committee: | Staff |
Action Type: | Initial Plan Submission |
Conditions/Notes: | |
Date: | February 16, 2023 |
Committee: | Local Design Review Committee |
Action Type: | Schematic Approval W/Conditions |
Conditions: | |
1) Facade and Massing needs further study: a) Can penthouse be stepped back to create more articulation? Consider changes in plane to avoid a heavy / rigid / strict feeling. Building design references water and some changes can better illustrate that. b) CBA building at corner could be reflected as active instead of mechanical. Is there an opportunity for some active programming at this location? 2) Landscape - plaza does not reflect actual placemaking and feels like a space of transition. Consider an opportunity to include an interpretive feature to describe what's going on inside. Benches are decorative and it doesn't feel like a true public space.
|
|
Date: | February 17, 2023 |
Committee: | City Planning Commission |
Action Type: | Schematic Design Approval |
Conditions: | |
with Conditions: Incorporate the DRAC's comments; reminding applicant to be more intentional in reaching out to the surrounding community; urging applicant to create outdoor sapces that are engaging for folks who work there, travel through the campus, |
Date: | May 25, 2023 |
Committee: | Staff |
Action Type: | Revised Plan Submission |
Conditions/Notes: | |
Date: | June 1, 2023 |
Committee: | Local Design Review Committee |
Action Type: | Approved with Conditions |
Conditions: | |
1) Upper two mechanical screening solutions are further studied to help alleviate massing of the two mechanical levels. Motion; Augoustidis, Second; Brown Voting members: Rothenberg, Augoustidis, Brown, Holland, Madison, Pace, Solon, Strean, Trotta, Calhoun Non-voting members; Scott, Provolt, Tzeng |
|
Date: | June 2, 2023 |
Committee: | City Planning Commission |
Action Type: | Approved with Conditions |
Conditions: | |
Incorporate the DRAC's comments; amenities plan should be reviewed by staff for approval. |